WALA/com.ibm.wala.core/src/com/ibm/wala/analysis
Ben Liblit ed0ddd780f Correct HTML embedded in Javadoc comments
Most of the invalid HTML arose from bare "<" and ">" characters.
These should be escaped as "&lt;" and "&gt;" when not intended to
introduce HTML tags.  When you have many such characters close
together, "{@literal ...}" is a nice, readable alternative that
automatically escapes its contents.  If the text in question is
intended to be a code fragment, then "{@code ...}"  is appropriate:
this is essentially equivalent to "<code>{@literal ...}</code>".

There were a few other HTML violations too, but none common enough to
be worth detailing here.
2016-11-28 11:14:41 -06:00
..
arraybounds Correct HTML embedded in Javadoc comments 2016-11-28 11:14:41 -06:00
exceptionanalysis Fix numerous unescaped "<" and ">" in Javadoc @author tags 2016-11-27 21:24:03 -06:00
nullpointer Fix numerous unescaped "<" and ">" in Javadoc @author tags 2016-11-27 21:24:03 -06:00
pointers add more functionality to analysis engine: create SDGs and 2016-08-18 22:43:12 -04:00
reflection support for full CPA, when desired. 2016-09-15 21:32:35 -04:00
stackMachine fixed JavaDoc warnings 2014-06-20 10:31:27 +02:00
typeInference more support for Java 7: 2014-08-07 16:02:48 -04:00