Fix Terms and Definitons section in CENELEC
ci/woodpecker/push/build Pipeline was successful
Details
ci/woodpecker/push/build Pipeline was successful
Details
This commit is contained in:
parent
ae3300ac2c
commit
c00c6ed31d
|
@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ implement specific functions\<close>
|
|||
Definition*[PM, short_name="''project management''"]
|
||||
\<open>administrative and/or technical conduct of a project, including safety aspects\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[PGMGR, short_name="''project manager''"]
|
||||
Definition*[PMGR, short_name="''project manager''"]
|
||||
\<open>entity that carries out project management\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[reliability]
|
||||
|
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Definition*[robustness]
|
|||
Definition*[RMGR, short_name="''requirements manager''"]
|
||||
\<open>entity that carries out requirements management\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[RMGMT, short_name="''requirements management''"]
|
||||
Definition*[RM, short_name="''requirements management''"]
|
||||
\<open>the process of eliciting, documenting, analysing, prioritising and agreeing on requirements and
|
||||
then controlling change and communicating to relevant stakeholders. It is a continuous process
|
||||
throughout a project\<close>
|
||||
|
@ -190,20 +190,23 @@ Definition*[SB, short_name="''software baseline''"]
|
|||
\<open>complete and consistent set of source code, executable files, configuration files,
|
||||
installation scripts and documentation that are needed for a software release. Information about
|
||||
compilers, operating systems, preexisting software and dependent tools is stored as part of the
|
||||
baseline. This will enable the organisation to software deployment
|
||||
transferring, installing and activating a deliverable software baseline that has already been
|
||||
released and assessed
|
||||
\<close>
|
||||
baseline. This will enable the organisation to reproduce defined versions and be the input
|
||||
for future releases at enhancements or at upgrade in the maintenance phase\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[SD, short_name="''software deployment''"]
|
||||
\<open>transferring, installing and activating a deliverable software baseline that has already been
|
||||
released and assessed\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[SWLC, short_name="''software life-cycle''"]
|
||||
\<open>those activities occurring during a period of time that starts when
|
||||
software is conceived and ends when the software is no longer available for use. The software life
|
||||
cycle typically includes a requirements phase, design phase,test phase, integration phase,
|
||||
deployment phase and a maintenance phase 3.1.35 software maintainability
|
||||
capability of the software to be modified; to correct faults, improve to a different environment
|
||||
\<close>
|
||||
deployment phase and a maintenance phase\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[SWMA, short_name="''software maintainability''"]
|
||||
\<open>capability of the software to be modified; to correct faults,
|
||||
improve performance or other attributes, or adapt it to a different environment\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[SM, short_name="''software maintenance''"]
|
||||
\<open> action, or set of actions, carried out on software after deployment functionality
|
||||
|
@ -211,7 +214,8 @@ performance or other attributes, or adapt it with the aim of enhancing or correc
|
|||
|
||||
Definition*[SOSIL, short_name="''software safety integrity level''"]
|
||||
\<open>classification number which determines the techniques and measures that have to be applied to
|
||||
software NOTE Safety-related software has been classified into five safety integrity levels, where
|
||||
software
|
||||
NOTE: Safety-related software has been classified into five safety integrity levels, where
|
||||
0 is the lowest and 4 the highest.\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[supplier]
|
||||
|
@ -230,20 +234,20 @@ performance compared to the corresponding requirements specification\<close>
|
|||
|
||||
Definition*[TCT1, short_name="''tool class T1''"]
|
||||
\<open>generates no outputs which can directly or indirectly contribute to the executable code
|
||||
(including data) of the software NOTE 11 examples include: a text editor or a requirement or
|
||||
(including data) of the software
|
||||
NOTE: T1 examples include: a text editor or a requirement or
|
||||
design support tool with no automatic code generation capabilities; configuration control tools.\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[TCT2,short_name="''tool class T2''"]
|
||||
\<open>supports the test or verification of the design or executable code, where errors in the tool
|
||||
can fail to reveal defects but cannot directly create errors in the executable software
|
||||
NOTE T2 examples include: a test harness generator; a test coverage measurement tool; a static
|
||||
analysis tool. reproduce defined versions and be the input for future releases at enhancements or
|
||||
at upgrade in the maintenance phase
|
||||
\<close>
|
||||
NOTE: T2 examples include: a test harness generator; a test coverage measurement tool; a static
|
||||
analysis tool.\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[TCT3, short_name="''tool class T3''"]
|
||||
\<open>generates outputs which can directly or indirectly contribute to the executable code
|
||||
(including data) of the safety related system NOTE T3 examples include: a source code compiler,
|
||||
(including data) of the safety related system
|
||||
NOTE: T3 examples include: a source code compiler,
|
||||
a data/algorithms compiler, a tool to change set-points during system operation; an optimising
|
||||
compiler where the relationship between the source code program and the generated object code is
|
||||
not obvious; a compiler that incorporates an executable run-time package into the executable code.
|
||||
|
@ -266,7 +270,8 @@ Definition*[verification, short_name="''verification''"]
|
|||
\<open>process of examination followed by a judgment based on evidence that output items (process,
|
||||
documentation, software or application) of a specific development phase fulfils the requirements of
|
||||
that phase with respect to completeness, correctness and consistency.
|
||||
NOTE Verification is mostly based on document reviews (design, implementation, test documents etc.).
|
||||
NOTE: Verification is mostly based on document reviews
|
||||
(design, implementation, test documents etc.).
|
||||
\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
Definition*[verifier, short_name="''verifier''"]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue