lh-l4v/proof/crefine
Joel Beeren 4601f2a1ab Genericise deletion actions that occur after empty_slot
This patch adds a generic "post_cap_deletion" step that is called by
finalise_slot. Previous to this, the only caps which had actions
required at this stage were IRQHandlerCaps -- it was required that the
IRQ bitmap be updated after the cap itself was removed (as the
invariants state that for any existing IRQHandlerCap, the corresponding
bit in the IRQ bitmap must be set).

By genericising this, we add the capacity for new, arch-specific post
cap deletion actions to occur in the future.
2018-02-23 09:12:55 +11:00
..
ARM Genericise deletion actions that occur after empty_slot 2018-02-23 09:12:55 +11:00
ARM_HYP Genericise deletion actions that occur after empty_slot 2018-02-23 09:12:55 +11:00
X64 Genericise deletion actions that occur after empty_slot 2018-02-23 09:12:55 +11:00
README.md fix broken README links 2018-01-29 13:24:35 +11:00

README.md

C Refinement Proof

This proof establishes that seL4's C code, once translated into Isabelle/HOL using Michael Norrish's C parser, is a formal refinement (i.e. a correct implementation) of its design specification and, transitively (using the results of the Design Spec Refinement Proof) seL4's C code is also a formal refinement of its abstract specification. In other words, this proof establishes that seL4's C code correctly implements its abstract specification.

The approach used for the proof is described in the TPHOLS '09 [paper][5].

Building

To build from the l4v/proof directory, run:

make CRefine

If you wish to build for a specific architecture other than the default, set your L4V_ARCH environment variable accordingly, as documented for the C code translation.

Important Theories

The top-level theory where the refinement statement is established over the entire kernel is Refine_C; the state-relation that relates the state-spaces of the two specifications is defined in StateRelation_C.

Note that this proof deals with two C-level semantics of seL4: one produced directly by the C parser from the kernel's C code, and another produced by the C spec's Substitute theory. These proofs largely operate on the latter, proving that it corresponds to the design spec. Refinement between the two C-level specs is proved in the CToCRefine theory. The top-level Refine_C theory quotes both refinement properties.