Featherweight_OCL/Featherweight_OCL/basic_types/UML_Boolean.thy

127 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext

(*****************************************************************************
* Featherweight-OCL --- A Formal Semantics for UML-OCL Version OCL 2.5
* for the OMG Standard.
* http://www.brucker.ch/projects/hol-testgen/
*
* UML_Boolean.thy --- Library definitions.
* This file is part of HOL-TestGen.
*
* Copyright (c) 2012-2015 Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, France
* 2013-2015 IRT SystemX, France
*
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
* met:
*
* * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
*
* * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
* copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
* disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
* with the distribution.
*
* * Neither the name of the copyright holders nor the names of its
* contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
* from this software without specific prior written permission.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
* "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
* LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
* A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
* OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
* SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
* LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
* DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
* THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
* OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
******************************************************************************)
theory UML_Boolean
imports "../UML_PropertyProfiles"
begin
subsection\<open>Fundamental Predicates on Basic Types: Strict (Referential) Equality\<close>
text\<open>
Here is a first instance of a definition of strict value equality---for
the special case of the type @{typ "('\<AA>)Boolean"}, it is just
the strict extension of the logical
equality:
\<close>
overloading StrictRefEq \<equiv> "StrictRefEq :: [('\<AA>)Boolean,('\<AA>)Boolean] \<Rightarrow> ('\<AA>)Boolean"
begin
definition StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n[code_unfold] :
"(x::('\<AA>)Boolean) \<doteq> y \<equiv> \<lambda> \<tau>. if (\<upsilon> x) \<tau> = true \<tau> \<and> (\<upsilon> y) \<tau> = true \<tau>
then (x \<triangleq> y)\<tau>
else invalid \<tau>"
end
text\<open>which implies elementary properties like:\<close>
lemma [simp,code_unfold] : "(true \<doteq> false) = false"
by(simp add:StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n)
lemma [simp,code_unfold] : "(false \<doteq> true) = false"
by(simp add:StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n)
lemma null_non_false [simp,code_unfold]:"(null \<doteq> false) = false"
apply(rule ext, simp add: StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n StrongEq_def false_def)
by (metis drop.simps cp_valid false_def is_none_code(2) Option.is_none_def valid4
bot_option_def null_fun_def null_option_def)
lemma null_non_true [simp,code_unfold]:"(null \<doteq> true) = false"
apply(rule ext, simp add: StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n StrongEq_def false_def)
by(simp add: true_def bot_option_def null_fun_def null_option_def)
lemma false_non_null [simp,code_unfold]:"(false \<doteq> null) = false"
apply(rule ext, simp add: StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n StrongEq_def false_def)
by(metis drop.simps cp_valid false_def is_none_code(2) Option.is_none_def valid4
bot_option_def null_fun_def null_option_def )
lemma true_non_null [simp,code_unfold]:"(true \<doteq> null) = false"
apply(rule ext, simp add: StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n StrongEq_def false_def)
by(simp add: true_def bot_option_def null_fun_def null_option_def)
text\<open>With respect to strictness properties and miscelleaneous side-calculi,
strict referential equality behaves on booleans as described in the
@{term "profile_bin\<^sub>S\<^sub>t\<^sub>r\<^sub>o\<^sub>n\<^sub>g\<^sub>E\<^sub>q_\<^sub>v_\<^sub>v"}:\<close>
interpretation StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n : profile_bin\<^sub>S\<^sub>t\<^sub>r\<^sub>o\<^sub>n\<^sub>g\<^sub>E\<^sub>q_\<^sub>v_\<^sub>v "\<lambda> x y. (x::('\<AA>)Boolean) \<doteq> y"
by unfold_locales (auto simp:StrictRefEq\<^sub>B\<^sub>o\<^sub>o\<^sub>l\<^sub>e\<^sub>a\<^sub>n)
text\<open>In particular, it is strict, cp-preserving and const-preserving. In particular,
it generates the simplifier rules for terms like:\<close>
lemma "(invalid \<doteq> false) = invalid" by(simp)
lemma "(invalid \<doteq> true) = invalid" by(simp)
lemma "(false \<doteq> invalid) = invalid" by(simp)
lemma "(true \<doteq> invalid) = invalid" by(simp)
lemma "((invalid::('\<AA>)Boolean) \<doteq> invalid) = invalid" by(simp)
text\<open>Thus, the weak equality is \emph{not} reflexive.\<close>
subsection\<open>Test Statements on Boolean Operations.\<close>
text\<open>Here follows a list of code-examples, that explain the meanings
of the above definitions by compilation to code and execution to @{term "True"}.\<close>
text\<open>Elementary computations on Boolean\<close>
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> \<upsilon>(true)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> \<delta>(false)"
Assert "\<tau> |\<noteq> \<delta>(null)"
Assert "\<tau> |\<noteq> \<delta>(invalid)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> \<upsilon>((null::('\<AA>)Boolean))"
Assert "\<tau> |\<noteq> \<upsilon>(invalid)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> (true and true)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> (true and true \<triangleq> true)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> ((null or null) \<triangleq> null)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> ((null or null) \<doteq> null)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> ((true \<triangleq> false) \<triangleq> false)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> ((invalid \<triangleq> false) \<triangleq> false)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> ((invalid \<doteq> false) \<triangleq> invalid)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> (true <> false)"
Assert "\<tau> \<Turnstile> (false <> true)"
end