added elements in Conclusion Related Work
This commit is contained in:
parent
17c6e87b8d
commit
3226fdf0c8
|
@ -20,6 +20,23 @@
|
|||
note = {Part of the Isabelle distribution.}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{KohlhaseR21,
|
||||
author = {Michael Kohlhase and
|
||||
Florian Rabe},
|
||||
title = {Experiences from Exporting Major Proof Assistant Libraries},
|
||||
journal = {J. Autom. Reason.},
|
||||
volume = {65},
|
||||
number = {8},
|
||||
pages = {1265--1298},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-021-09604-0},
|
||||
doi = {10.1007/s10817-021-09604-0},
|
||||
timestamp = {Wed, 03 Nov 2021 08:27:13 +0100},
|
||||
biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/jar/KohlhaseR21.bib},
|
||||
bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@TechReport{Parsia:12:OWO,
|
||||
author = "Bijan Parsia and Boris Motik and Peter Patel-Schneider",
|
||||
title = "{OWL} 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax (Second Edition)",
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -939,11 +939,33 @@ onto_class assoc_Method_Problem =
|
|||
\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
section*[concl::conclusion]\<open>Conclusion\<close>
|
||||
text\<open>We presented \<^dof>, an ontology framework
|
||||
deeply integrating continuous-check/continuous-build functionality into
|
||||
the formal development process in \<^hol>. The novel feature of term-contexts in \<^dof>,
|
||||
which permits term-antiquotations elaborated in the parsing process, paves the
|
||||
way for the abstract specification of meta-data constraints as well the possibility
|
||||
of advanced search in the meta-data of document elements. Thus it profits and
|
||||
extends Isabelle's document-centric view on formal development.
|
||||
|
||||
Many ontological languages such OWL as well as the meta-modeling technology
|
||||
available for UML/OCL provide concepts for semantic rules and constraints, but
|
||||
leave the checking of these usually to external tools (if implementing them at all),
|
||||
thus limiting their practical usefulness drastically. Our approach treats them as
|
||||
first-class citizens, and makes them to an object of formal study in, for example,
|
||||
ontological mappings. Such a technology exists, to our knowledge, for the first time.
|
||||
|
||||
Our experiments with adaptions of existing ontologies from engineering and mathematics
|
||||
show that \<^dof>'s ODL has sufficient expressive power to cover all aspects
|
||||
of languages such as OWL (with perhaps the exception of multiple inheritance on classes).
|
||||
However, these ontologies have been developed specifically \<^emph>\<open>in\<close> OWL and targeting
|
||||
its support, the Protege editor. We argue that \<^dof> might ask for a re-engineering
|
||||
of these ontologies: less deep hierarchies, rather deeper structure in meta-data
|
||||
and stronger invariants.
|
||||
\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
subsection*[rw::related_work]\<open>Related Works\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
text\<open>
|
||||
\<^item> Geschwalle: Tom Gruber's "Ontology for Engineering Mathematics"
|
||||
\<^url>\<open>https://tomgruber.org/writing/an-ontology-for-engineering-mathematics\<close>
|
||||
\<^item> OntoMathPro contains indeed something like a "taxonomy of the fields of mathematics" pp 110
|
||||
\<^url>\<open>https://kpfu.ru/staff_files/F_438204284/OntoMathPro_ontology_KESW2014.pdf\<close>
|
||||
According to In total, OntoMathPRO contains 3,449 classes ...
|
||||
|
@ -960,12 +982,34 @@ text\<open>
|
|||
\<^url>\<open>http://data.sciencewise.info/openrdf-sesame/repositories/SW\<close>
|
||||
\<^url>\<open>https://github.com/CLLKazan/OntoMathPro\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
\<^item> Search Engines: Wikipedia Formula Search, \<^url>\<open>http://shinh.org/wfs\<close>
|
||||
\<^item> The search engine \<^url>\<open>http://shinh.org/wfs\<close> uses a quite brute-force,
|
||||
but practical approach. It is getting its raw-data from Wikipedia and PlanetMath
|
||||
and similar sites. Its is based on a clever text-based search in
|
||||
a large number of formulas, agnostic of their logical context, and of formal proof.
|
||||
|
||||
\<^item> And then: The stuff from Univ Erlangen (Kohlhase et al).
|
||||
\<^item> The OAF project @{cite "KohlhaseR21"} comes closest to our ideal of wide-spread
|
||||
use of ontologies for search functionalities in mathematical libraries.
|
||||
The project developed a common ontological format, called OMDoc/MMT, and
|
||||
developed six export functions from major ITP systems such as HOL Light,
|
||||
Mizar, PVS, IMPS, Coq, and Isabelle into it. The more difficult task to
|
||||
develop import functions (providing possibly imported proofs in a native
|
||||
proof format) has not been addressed; rather, the emphasis was put on building
|
||||
an a server infrastructure based on conventional, rather heavy-weight
|
||||
database- and OWL technology.
|
||||
Our approach targets so far only one ITP system and its libraries, and emphasizes
|
||||
type-safeness, expressive power and "depth" of meta-data, which is adapted
|
||||
to the specific needs of ITP systems and theory developments.
|
||||
|
||||
% ITEM The "Ontology for Engineering Mathematics"
|
||||
% \<^url>\<open>https://tomgruber.org/writing/an-ontology-for-engineering-mathematics\<close> is
|
||||
% is unfortunately only a half-baked approach to model physical quantities
|
||||
% and SI-measurements. Instead of using ontologies for this purpose, there
|
||||
% exist approaches based on strong type systems
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\<close>
|
||||
|
||||
(*
|
||||
subsubsection\<open>The notion of \<^emph>\<open>Integrated Source\<close>\<close>
|
||||
text\<open>Links to the term: Integrated Document
|
||||
\<^item> \<^url>\<open>https://www.openkm.com/blog/integrated-document-management.html\<close>
|
||||
|
@ -992,6 +1036,7 @@ text\<open>
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
\<close>
|
||||
*)
|
||||
(*
|
||||
Data integration driven ontology design, case study smart city
|
||||
Authors: German Nemirovski, Andreas Nolle, Álvaro Sicilia,Ilaria Ballarini,Vincenzo Corado
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue