updating the last pargraph of proving morphisms on ontologies section
ci/woodpecker/push/build Pipeline was successful
Details
ci/woodpecker/push/build Pipeline was successful
Details
This commit is contained in:
parent
acbaa582ef
commit
abeb2f7f5e
|
@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ meta-data into another format along an ontological mapping are nearly trivial: a
|
||||||
the invariant and the morphism definitions, the preservation proof is automatic. The advantage
|
the invariant and the morphism definitions, the preservation proof is automatic. The advantage
|
||||||
of using the \<^dof> framework compared to approaches like ATL or EXPRESS-X is
|
of using the \<^dof> framework compared to approaches like ATL or EXPRESS-X is
|
||||||
the possibility of formally verifying the \<^emph>\<open>mapping rules\<close>. \<^ie> proving the preservation
|
the possibility of formally verifying the \<^emph>\<open>mapping rules\<close>. \<^ie> proving the preservation
|
||||||
of invariants, as we will demonstrate in the following example.\<close>
|
of invariants, as we have demonstrated in the previous example.\<close>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(*
|
(*
|
||||||
section*[ontoexample::text_section,main_author="Some(@{docitem ''idir''}::author)"]
|
section*[ontoexample::text_section,main_author="Some(@{docitem ''idir''}::author)"]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue