Added publications.
This commit is contained in:
parent
326517f7f9
commit
98db296499
|
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||||
|
To cite the use of this formal theory, please use
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Achim D. Brucker, Frédéric Tuong, and Burkhart Wolff. Featherweight
|
||||||
|
OCL: A Proposal for a Machine-Checked Formal Semantics for OCL
|
||||||
|
2.5. In Archive of Formal Proofs,
|
||||||
|
2014. http://www.isa-afp.org/entries/Featherweight_OCL.shtml, Formal
|
||||||
|
proof development
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Article{ brucker.ea:featherweight:2014,
|
||||||
|
abstract = {The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is one of the
|
||||||
|
few modeling languages that is widely used in
|
||||||
|
industry. While UML is mostly known as diagrammatic
|
||||||
|
modeling language (e.g., visualizing class models),
|
||||||
|
it is complemented by a textual language, called
|
||||||
|
Object Constraint Language (OCL). OCL is based on a
|
||||||
|
three-valued logic that turns UML into a formal
|
||||||
|
language. Unfortunately the semantics of this
|
||||||
|
specification language, captured in the "Annex A" of
|
||||||
|
the OCL standard, leads to different interpretations
|
||||||
|
of corner cases. We formalize the core of OCL:
|
||||||
|
denotational definitions, a logical calculus and
|
||||||
|
operational rules that allow for the execution of
|
||||||
|
OCL expressions by a mixture of term rewriting and
|
||||||
|
code compilation. Our formalization reveals several
|
||||||
|
inconsistencies and contradictions in the current
|
||||||
|
version of the OCL standard. Overall, this document
|
||||||
|
is intended to provide the basis for a
|
||||||
|
machine-checked text "Annex A" of the OCL standard
|
||||||
|
targeting at tool implementors.},
|
||||||
|
author = {Achim D. Brucker and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Tuong and Burkhart Wolff},
|
||||||
|
file = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/download/2014/brucker.ea-featherweight-outline-2014.pdf},
|
||||||
|
filelabel= {Outline},
|
||||||
|
issn = {2150-914x},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Archive of Formal Proofs},
|
||||||
|
month = {jan},
|
||||||
|
note = {\url{http://www.isa-afp.org/entries/Featherweight_OCL.shtml}, Formal proof development},
|
||||||
|
pdf = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/download/2014/brucker.ea-featherweight-2014.pdf},
|
||||||
|
title = {Featherweight OCL: A Proposal for a Machine-Checked Formal Semantics for OCL 2.5},
|
||||||
|
url = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/abstract/brucker.ea-featherweight-2014},
|
||||||
|
year = {2014},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An overview of the formalization is given in:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Achim D. Brucker and Burkhart Wolff. Featherweight OCL: A study for
|
||||||
|
the consistent semantics of OCL 2.3 in HOL. In Workshop on OCL and
|
||||||
|
Textual Modelling (OCL 2012). , pages 19-24, 2012. The semantics for
|
||||||
|
the Boolean operators proposed in this paper was adopted by the OCL
|
||||||
|
2.4 standard.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@InProceedings{ brucker.ea:featherweight:2012,
|
||||||
|
abstract = {At its origins, OCL was conceived as a strict
|
||||||
|
semantics for undefinedness, with the exception of the
|
||||||
|
logical connectives of type Boolean that constitute a
|
||||||
|
three-valued propositional logic. Recent versions of
|
||||||
|
the OCL standard added a second exception element,
|
||||||
|
which, similar to the null references in programming
|
||||||
|
languages, is given a non-strict semantics.\\\\In this
|
||||||
|
paper, we report on our results in formalizing the
|
||||||
|
core of OCL in higher-order logic (HOL). This
|
||||||
|
formalization revealed several inconsistencies and
|
||||||
|
contradictions in the current version of the OCL
|
||||||
|
standard. These inconsistencies and contradictions are
|
||||||
|
reflected in the challenge to define and implement OCL
|
||||||
|
tools (e.g., interpreters, code-generators, or theorem
|
||||||
|
provers) in a uniform manner.},
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
author = {Achim D. Brucker and Burkhart Wolff},
|
||||||
|
booktitle= {Workshop on OCL and Textual Modelling (OCL 2012)},
|
||||||
|
doi = {10.1145/2428516.2428520},
|
||||||
|
isbn = {978-1-4503-1799-3},
|
||||||
|
keywords = {OCL, HOL-OCL, formal semantics},
|
||||||
|
note = {The semantics for the Boolean operators proposed in this paper
|
||||||
|
was adopted by the OCL 2.4 standard.},
|
||||||
|
pages = {19--24},
|
||||||
|
pdf = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/download/2012/brucker.ea-featherweight-2012.pdf},
|
||||||
|
talk = {talk:brucker.ea:featherweight:2012},
|
||||||
|
title = {Featherweight OCL: A study for the consistent semantics of OCL 2.3 in HOL},
|
||||||
|
url = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/abstract/brucker.ea-featherweight-2012},
|
||||||
|
year = {2012},
|
||||||
|
}
|
12
README.md
12
README.md
|
@ -15,3 +15,15 @@ submitted (as an update of the UPF entry) at a later stage.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## License
|
## License
|
||||||
This project is licensed under a 3-clause BSD-style license.
|
This project is licensed under a 3-clause BSD-style license.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Publications
|
||||||
|
* Achim D. Brucker, Frédéric Tuong, and Burkhart Wolff. Featherweight
|
||||||
|
OCL: A Proposal for a Machine-Checked Formal Semantics for OCL 2.5. In
|
||||||
|
Archive of Formal Proofs, 2014.
|
||||||
|
http://www.isa-afp.org/entries/Featherweight_OCL.shtml, Formal proof
|
||||||
|
development.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Achim D. Brucker and Burkhart Wolff. Featherweight OCL: A study for
|
||||||
|
the consistent semantics of OCL 2.3 in HOL. In Workshop on OCL and
|
||||||
|
Textual Modelling (OCL 2012), pages 19-24, 2012.
|
||||||
|
https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/abstract/brucker.ea-featherweight-2012
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue