forked from Isabelle_DOF/Isabelle_DOF
514 lines
19 KiB
BibTeX
Executable File
514 lines
19 KiB
BibTeX
Executable File
@STRING{pub-springer={Springer} }
|
|
@STRING{pub-springer:adr="" }
|
|
@STRING{s-lncs = "LNCS" }
|
|
|
|
@Misc{ w3c:ontologies:2015,
|
|
author = {W3C},
|
|
title = {Ontologies},
|
|
organisation = {W3c},
|
|
url = {https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/ontology},
|
|
year = 2015
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Misc{ ibm:doors:2019,
|
|
author = {IBM},
|
|
title = {{IBM} Engineering Requirements Management {DOORS} Family},
|
|
note = {\url{https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/requirements-management}},
|
|
year = 2019
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Manual{ wenzel:isabelle-isar:2020,
|
|
title = {The Isabelle/Isar Reference Manual},
|
|
author = {Makarius Wenzel},
|
|
year = 2020,
|
|
note = {Part of the Isabelle distribution.}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InCollection{ brucker.ea:isabelledof:2019,
|
|
abstract = {DOF is a novel framework for defining ontologies and
|
|
enforcing them during document development and evolution. A
|
|
major goal of DOF is the integrated development of formal
|
|
certification documents (e. g., for Common Criteria or
|
|
CENELEC 50128) that require consistency across both formal
|
|
and informal arguments.
|
|
|
|
To support a consistent development of formal and informal
|
|
parts of a document, we provide Isabelle/DOF, an
|
|
implementation of DOF on top of the formal methods
|
|
framework Isabelle/HOL. A particular emphasis is put on a
|
|
deep integration into Isabelle{\^a}s IDE, which allows for
|
|
smooth ontology development as well as immediate
|
|
ontological feedback during the editing of a document.
|
|
|
|
In this paper, we give an in-depth presentation of the
|
|
design concepts of DOF's Ontology Definition Language
|
|
(ODL) and key aspects of the technology of its
|
|
implementation. Isabelle/DOF is the first ontology language
|
|
supporting machine-checked links between the formal and
|
|
informal parts in an LCF-style interactive theorem proving
|
|
environment. Sufficiently annotated, large documents can
|
|
easily be developed collabo- ratively, while ensuring their
|
|
consistency, and the impact of changes (in the formal and
|
|
the semi-formal content) is tracked automatically.},
|
|
keywords = {Ontology, Formal Document Development, CERtification, DOF,
|
|
Isabelle/DOF},
|
|
location = {Oslo},
|
|
author = {Achim D. Brucker and Burkhart Wolff},
|
|
booktitle = {Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM)},
|
|
language = {USenglish},
|
|
url = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/abstract/brucker.ea-isabelledof-2019},
|
|
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
|
|
address = {Heidelberg},
|
|
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
|
|
number = {11724},
|
|
isbn = {3-540-25109-X},
|
|
doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-30446-1_15},
|
|
editor = {Peter C. {\"O}lveczky and Gwen Sala{\"u}n},
|
|
pdf = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/download/2019/brucker.ea-isabelledof-2019.pdf},
|
|
title = {{Isabelle/DOF}: Design and Implementation},
|
|
classification= {conference},
|
|
areas = {formal methods, software},
|
|
categories = {isadof},
|
|
year = {2019},
|
|
public = {yes}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InCollection{ brucker.ea:isabelle-ontologies:2018,
|
|
abstract = {While Isabelle is mostly known as part of Isabelle/HOL (an
|
|
interactive theorem prover), it actually provides a
|
|
framework for developing a wide spectrum of applications. A
|
|
particular strength of the Isabelle framework is the
|
|
combination of text editing, formal verification, and code
|
|
generation.
|
|
|
|
Up to now, Isabelle's document preparation system lacks a
|
|
mechanism for ensuring the structure of different document
|
|
types (as, e.g., required in certification processes) in
|
|
general and, in particular, mechanism for linking informal
|
|
and formal parts of a document.
|
|
|
|
In this paper, we present Isabelle/DOF, a novel Document
|
|
Ontology Framework on top of Isabelle. Isabelle/DOF allows
|
|
for conventional typesetting \emph{as well} as formal
|
|
development. We show how to model document ontologies
|
|
inside Isabelle/DOF, how to use the resulting
|
|
meta-information for enforcing a certain document
|
|
structure, and discuss ontology-specific IDE support.},
|
|
keywords = {Isabelle/Isar, HOL, Ontologies},
|
|
location = {Hagenberg, Austria},
|
|
author = {Achim D. Brucker and Idir Ait-Sadoune and Paolo Crisafulli
|
|
and Burkhart Wolff},
|
|
booktitle = {Conference on Intelligent Computer Mathematics (CICM)},
|
|
language = {USenglish},
|
|
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
|
|
address = {Heidelberg},
|
|
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
|
|
number = {11006},
|
|
url = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/abstract/brucker.ea-isabelle-ontologies-2018},
|
|
title = {Using the {Isabelle} Ontology Framework: Linking the
|
|
Formal with the Informal},
|
|
classification= {conference},
|
|
areas = {formal methods, software},
|
|
categories = {isadof},
|
|
public = {yes},
|
|
year = {2018},
|
|
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-96812-4_3},
|
|
pdf = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/download/2018/brucker.ea-isabelle-ontologies-2018.pdf}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InCollection{ taha.ea:philosophers:2020,
|
|
keywords = {CSP, Isabelle/HOL, Process-Algebra,Formal Verification, Refinement},
|
|
author = {Safouan Taha and Burkhart Wolff and Lina Ye},
|
|
booktitle = {International Conference on Integrated Formal Methods (IFM)},
|
|
language = {USenglish},
|
|
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
|
|
address = {Heidelberg},
|
|
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
|
|
number = {to appear},
|
|
title = {Philosophers may dine --- definitively!},
|
|
classification= {conference},
|
|
areas = {formal methods, software},
|
|
public = {yes},
|
|
year = {2020}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@Book{ boulanger:cenelec-50128:2015,
|
|
author = {Boulanger, Jean-Louis},
|
|
title = {{CENELEC} 50128 and {IEC} 62279 Standards},
|
|
publisher = {Wiley-ISTE},
|
|
year = 2015,
|
|
address = {Boston}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Booklet{ cc:cc-part3:2006,
|
|
bibkey = {cc:cc-part3:2006},
|
|
key = {Common Criteria},
|
|
institution = {Common Criteria},
|
|
language = {USenglish},
|
|
month = sep,
|
|
year = 2006,
|
|
public = {yes},
|
|
title = {Common Criteria for Information Technology Security
|
|
Evaluation (Version 3.1), {Part} 3: Security assurance
|
|
components},
|
|
note = {Available as document
|
|
\href{http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/public/files/CCPART3V3.1R1.pdf}
|
|
{CCMB-2006-09-003}},
|
|
number = {CCMB-2006-09-003},
|
|
acknowledgement={brucker, 2007-04-24}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Book{ nipkow.ea:isabelle:2002,
|
|
author = {Tobias Nipkow and Lawrence C. Paulson and Markus Wenzel},
|
|
title = {Isabelle/HOL---A Proof Assistant for Higher-Order Logic},
|
|
publisher = pub-springer,
|
|
address = pub-springer:adr,
|
|
series = s-lncs,
|
|
volume = 2283,
|
|
doi = {10.1007/3-540-45949-9},
|
|
abstract = {This book is a self-contained introduction to interactive
|
|
proof in higher-order logic (\acs{hol}), using the proof
|
|
assistant Isabelle2002. It is a tutorial for potential
|
|
users rather than a monograph for researchers. The book has
|
|
three parts.
|
|
|
|
1. Elementary Techniques shows how to model functional
|
|
programs in higher-order logic. Early examples involve
|
|
lists and the natural numbers. Most proofs are two steps
|
|
long, consisting of induction on a chosen variable followed
|
|
by the auto tactic. But even this elementary part covers
|
|
such advanced topics as nested and mutual recursion. 2.
|
|
Logic and Sets presents a collection of lower-level tactics
|
|
that you can use to apply rules selectively. It also
|
|
describes Isabelle/\acs{hol}'s treatment of sets, functions
|
|
and relations and explains how to define sets inductively.
|
|
One of the examples concerns the theory of model checking,
|
|
and another is drawn from a classic textbook on formal
|
|
languages. 3. Advanced Material describes a variety of
|
|
other topics. Among these are the real numbers, records and
|
|
overloading. Advanced techniques are described involving
|
|
induction and recursion. A whole chapter is devoted to an
|
|
extended example: the verification of a security protocol. },
|
|
year = 2002,
|
|
acknowledgement={brucker, 2007-02-19},
|
|
bibkey = {nipkow.ea:isabelle:2002},
|
|
tags = {noTAG},
|
|
clearance = {unclassified},
|
|
timestap = {2008-05-26}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InProceedings{wenzel:asynchronous:2014,
|
|
author = {Makarius Wenzel},
|
|
title = {Asynchronous User Interaction and Tool Integration in
|
|
{Isabelle}/{PIDE}},
|
|
booktitle = {ITP},
|
|
pages = {515--530},
|
|
year = 2014,
|
|
crossref = {klein.ea:interactive:2014},
|
|
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-08970-6_33},
|
|
timestamp = {Sun, 21 May 2017 00:18:59 +0200},
|
|
abstract = { Historically, the LCF tradition of interactive theorem
|
|
proving was tied to the read-eval-print loop, with
|
|
sequential and synchronous evaluation of prover commands
|
|
given on the command-line. This user-interface technology
|
|
was adequate when R. Milner introduced his LCF proof
|
|
assistant in the 1970-ies, but it severely limits the
|
|
potential of current multicore hardware and advanced IDE
|
|
front-ends.
|
|
|
|
Isabelle/PIDE breaks this loop and retrofits the
|
|
read-eval-print phases into an asynchronous model of
|
|
document-oriented proof processing. Instead of feeding a
|
|
sequence of individual commands into the prover process,
|
|
the primary interface works via edits over a family of
|
|
document versions. Execution is implicit and managed by the
|
|
prover on its own account in a timeless and stateless
|
|
manner. Various aspects of interactive proof checking are
|
|
scheduled according to requirements determined by the
|
|
front-end perspective on the proof document, while making
|
|
adequate use of the CPU resources on multicore hardware on
|
|
the back-end.
|
|
|
|
Recent refinements of Isabelle/PIDE provide an explicit
|
|
concept of asynchronous print functions over existing proof
|
|
states. This allows to integrate long-running or
|
|
potentially non-terminating tools into the document-model.
|
|
Applications range from traditional proof state output
|
|
(which may consume substantial time in interactive
|
|
development) to automated provers and dis-provers that
|
|
report on existing proof document content (e.g.
|
|
Sledgehammer, Nitpick, Quickcheck in Isabelle/HOL).
|
|
Moreover, it is possible to integrate query operations via
|
|
additional GUI panels with separate input and output (e.g.
|
|
for Sledgehammer or find-theorems). Thus the Prover IDE
|
|
provides continuous proof processing, augmented by add-on
|
|
tools that help the user to continue writing proofs. }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Proceedings{ klein.ea:interactive:2014,
|
|
editor = {Gerwin Klein and Ruben Gamboa},
|
|
title = {Interactive Theorem Proving - 5th International
|
|
Conference, {ITP} 2014, Held as Part of the Vienna Summer
|
|
of Logic, {VSL} 2014, Vienna, Austria, July 14-17, 2014.
|
|
Proceedings},
|
|
series = s-lncs,
|
|
volume = 8558,
|
|
publisher = pub-springer,
|
|
year = 2014,
|
|
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-08970-6}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InProceedings{ bezzecchi.ea:making:2018,
|
|
title = {Making Agile Development Processes fit for V-style
|
|
Certification Procedures},
|
|
author = {Bezzecchi, S. and Crisafulli, P. and Pichot, C. and Wolff,
|
|
B.},
|
|
booktitle = {{ERTS'18}},
|
|
abstract = {We present a process for the development of safety and
|
|
security critical components in transportation systems
|
|
targeting a high-level certification (CENELEC 50126/50128,
|
|
DO 178, CC ISO/IEC 15408).
|
|
|
|
The process adheres to the objectives of an ``agile
|
|
development'' in terms of evolutionary flexibility and
|
|
continuous improvement. Yet, it enforces the overall
|
|
coherence of the development artifacts (ranging from proofs
|
|
over tests to code) by a particular environment (CVCE).
|
|
|
|
In particular, the validation process is built around a
|
|
formal development based on the interactive theorem proving
|
|
system Isabelle/HOL, by linking the business logic of the
|
|
application to the operating system model, down to code and
|
|
concrete hardware models thanks to a series of refinement
|
|
proofs.
|
|
|
|
We apply both the process and its support in CVCE to a
|
|
case-study that comprises a model of an odometric service
|
|
in a railway-system with its corresponding implementation
|
|
integrated in seL4 (a secure kernel for which a
|
|
comprehensive Isabelle development exists). Novel
|
|
techniques implemented in Isabelle enforce the coherence of
|
|
semi-formal and formal definitions within to specific
|
|
certification processes in order to improve their
|
|
cost-effectiveness. },
|
|
pdf = {https://www.lri.fr/~wolff/papers/conf/2018erts-agile-fm.pdf},
|
|
year = 2018,
|
|
series = {ERTS Conference Proceedings},
|
|
location = {Toulouse}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InCollection{ wenzel.ea:building:2007,
|
|
abstract = {We present the generic system framework of
|
|
Isabelle/Isarunderlying recent versions of Isabelle. Among
|
|
other things, Isar provides an infrastructure for Isabelle
|
|
plug-ins, comprising extensible state components and
|
|
extensible syntax that can be bound to tactical ML
|
|
programs. Thus the Isabelle/Isar architecture may be
|
|
understood as an extension and refinement of the
|
|
traditional LCF approach, with explicit infrastructure for
|
|
building derivative systems. To demonstrate the technical
|
|
potential of the framework, we apply it to a concrete
|
|
formalmethods tool: the HOL-Z 3.0 environment, which is
|
|
geared towards the analysis of Z specifications and formal
|
|
proof of forward-refinements.},
|
|
author = {Makarius Wenzel and Burkhart Wolff},
|
|
booktitle = {TPHOLs 2007},
|
|
editor = {Klaus Schneider and Jens Brandt},
|
|
language = {USenglish},
|
|
acknowledgement={none},
|
|
pages = {352--367},
|
|
publisher = pub-springer,
|
|
address = pub-springer:adr,
|
|
number = 4732,
|
|
series = s-lncs,
|
|
title = {Building Formal Method Tools in the {Isabelle}/{Isar}
|
|
Framework},
|
|
doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-74591-4_26},
|
|
year = 2007
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Misc{ biendarra.ea:defining:2019,
|
|
title = {Defining (Co)datatypes and Primitively (Co)recursive
|
|
Functions in Isabelle/HOL},
|
|
author = {Julian Biendarra and Jasmin Christian Blanchette and
|
|
Martin Desharnais and Lorenz Panny and Andrei Popescu and
|
|
Dmitriy Traytel},
|
|
note = {\url{https://isabelle.in.tum.de/doc/datatypes.pdf}},
|
|
year = 2019
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Misc{ kraus:defining:2020,
|
|
title = {Defining Recursive Functions in Isabelle/HOL},
|
|
author = {Alexander Kraus},
|
|
note = {\url{https://isabelle.in.tum.de/doc/functions.pdf}},
|
|
year = 2020
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Misc{ nipkow:whats:2020,
|
|
title = {What's in Main},
|
|
author = {Tobias Nipkow},
|
|
note = {\url{https://isabelle.in.tum.de/doc/main.pdf}},
|
|
year = 2020
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InProceedings{ wenzel:system:2014,
|
|
author = {Makarius Wenzel},
|
|
title = {System description: Isabelle/{jEdit} in 2014},
|
|
booktitle = {UITP},
|
|
pages = {84--94},
|
|
year = 2014,
|
|
doi = {10.4204/EPTCS.167.10}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InProceedings{ barras.ea:pervasive:2013,
|
|
author = {Bruno Barras and Lourdes Del Carmen
|
|
Gonz{\'{a}}lez{-}Huesca and Hugo Herbelin and Yann
|
|
R{\'{e}}gis{-}Gianas and Enrico Tassi and Makarius Wenzel
|
|
and Burkhart Wolff},
|
|
title = {Pervasive Parallelism in Highly-Trustable Interactive
|
|
Theorem Proving Systems},
|
|
booktitle = {MKM},
|
|
pages = {359--363},
|
|
year = 2013,
|
|
doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-39320-4_29}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Article{ faithfull.ea:coqoon:2018,
|
|
author = {Faithfull, Alexander and Bengtson, Jesper and Tassi,
|
|
Enrico and Tankink, Carst},
|
|
title = {Coqoon},
|
|
journal = {Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.},
|
|
issue_date = {April 2018},
|
|
volume = 20,
|
|
number = 2,
|
|
month = apr,
|
|
year = 2018,
|
|
issn = {1433-2779},
|
|
pages = {125--137},
|
|
numpages = 13,
|
|
doi = {10.1007/s10009-017-0457-2},
|
|
acmid = 3204223,
|
|
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
|
|
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@InProceedings{ abrial:steam-boiler:1996,
|
|
author = {Abrial, Jean-Raymond},
|
|
title = {Steam-Boiler Control Specification Problem},
|
|
booktitle = {Formal Methods for Industrial Applications, Specifying and
|
|
Programming the Steam Boiler Control (the Book Grow out of
|
|
a Dagstuhl Seminar, June 1995).},
|
|
year = 1996,
|
|
isbn = {3-540-61929-1},
|
|
pages = {500--509},
|
|
numpages = 10,
|
|
url = {http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=647370.723886},
|
|
acmid = 723886,
|
|
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
|
|
address = {London, UK, UK}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@TechReport{ bsi:50128:2014,
|
|
type = {Standard},
|
|
key = {BS EN 50128:2011},
|
|
month = apr,
|
|
year = 2014,
|
|
series = {British Standards Publication},
|
|
title = {BS EN 50128:2011: Railway applications -- Communication,
|
|
signalling and processing systems -- Software for railway
|
|
control and protecting systems},
|
|
institution = {Britisch Standards Institute (BSI)},
|
|
keywords = {CENELEC},
|
|
abstract = {This European Standard is part of a group of related
|
|
standards. The others are EN 50126-1:1999 "Railway
|
|
applications -- The specification and demonstration of
|
|
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety
|
|
(RAMS) -- Part 1: Basic requirements and generic process --
|
|
and EN 50129:2003 "Railway applications -- Communication,
|
|
signalling and processing systems -- Safety related
|
|
electronic systems for signalling". EN 50126-1 addresses
|
|
system issues on the widest scale, while EN 50129 addresses
|
|
the approval process for individual systems which can exist
|
|
within the overall railway control and protection system.
|
|
This European Standard concentrates on the methods which
|
|
need to be used in order to provide software which meets
|
|
the demands for safety integrity which are placed upon it
|
|
by these wider considerations. This European Standard
|
|
provides a set of requirements with which the development,
|
|
deployment and maintenance of any safety-related software
|
|
intended for railway control and protection applications
|
|
shall comply. It defines requirements concerning
|
|
organisational structure, the relationship between
|
|
organisations and division of responsibility involved in
|
|
the development, deployment and maintenanceactivities.}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Article{ kraus.ea:regular-sets-afp:2010,
|
|
author = {Alexander Krauss and Tobias Nipkow},
|
|
title = {Regular Sets and Expressions},
|
|
journal = {Archive of Formal Proofs},
|
|
month = may,
|
|
year = 2010,
|
|
note = {\url{http://isa-afp.org/entries/Regular-Sets.html}, Formal
|
|
proof development},
|
|
issn = {2150-914x}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Article{ nipkow.ea:functional-Automata-afp:2004,
|
|
author = {Tobias Nipkow},
|
|
title = {Functional Automata},
|
|
journal = {Archive of Formal Proofs},
|
|
month = mar,
|
|
year = 2004,
|
|
note = {\url{http://isa-afp.org/entries/Functional-Automata.html},
|
|
Formal proof development},
|
|
issn = {2150-914x}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Booklet{ kohm:koma-script:2019,
|
|
author = {Markus Kohm},
|
|
title = {{KOMA-Script}: a versatile {\LaTeXe{}} bundle},
|
|
year = 2019
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Booklet{ wenzel:system-manual:2020,
|
|
author = {Makarius Wenzel},
|
|
title = {The {Isabelle} System Manual},
|
|
year = 2020,
|
|
note = {Part of the Isabelle distribution.}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Booklet{ chervet:keycommand:2010,
|
|
author = {Florent Chervet},
|
|
title = {The free and open source keycommand package: key-value
|
|
interface for commands and environments in {\LaTeX}.},
|
|
year = 2010
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Book{ knuth:texbook:1986,
|
|
author = {Knuth, Donald E.},
|
|
title = {The TeXbook},
|
|
year = 1986,
|
|
isbn = 0201134470,
|
|
publisher = {Addison-Wesley Professional}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Book{ mittelbach.ea:latex:1999,
|
|
author = {Mittelbach, Frank and Goossens, Michel and Braams,
|
|
Johannes and Carlisle, David and Rowley, Chris},
|
|
title = {The LaTeX Companion},
|
|
year = 2004,
|
|
edition = {2nd},
|
|
publisher = {Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.},
|
|
address = {Boston, MA, USA}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Book{ eijkhout:latex-cs:2012,
|
|
author = {Victor Eijkhout},
|
|
title = {The Computer Science of TeX and LaTeX},
|
|
publisher = {Texas Advanced Computing Center},
|
|
year = 2012
|
|
}
|