startpunkt
This commit is contained in:
parent
cc787cb9f1
commit
a1941b2f15
|
@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
|
||||||
|
(*************************************************************************
|
||||||
|
* Copyright (C)
|
||||||
|
* 2019 The University of Exeter
|
||||||
|
* 2018-2019 The University of Paris-Saclay
|
||||||
|
* 2018 The University of Sheffield
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* License:
|
||||||
|
* This program can be redistributed and/or modified under the terms
|
||||||
|
* of the 2-clause BSD-style license.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
|
||||||
|
*************************************************************************)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
theory Nmath_exam
|
||||||
|
imports "../../DOF/Isa_COL"
|
||||||
|
begin
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(*<<*)
|
||||||
|
text\<open>In our scenario, content has four different types of addressees:
|
||||||
|
\<^item> the @{emph \<open>setter\<close>}, i.e. the author of the exam,
|
||||||
|
\<^item> the @{emph \<open>student\<close>}, i.e. the addressee of the exam,
|
||||||
|
\<^item> the @{emph \<open>checker\<close>}, i.e. a person that checks the exam for
|
||||||
|
\<^item> the @{emph \<open>external\_examiner\<close>}, i.e. a person that checks the exam for
|
||||||
|
feasibility and non-ambiguity.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note that the latter quality assurance mechanism is used in many universities,
|
||||||
|
where for organizational reasons the execution of an exam takes place in facilities
|
||||||
|
where the author of the exam is not expected to be physically present.
|
||||||
|
\<close>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
datatype ContentClass =
|
||||||
|
setter (* \<open>the 'author' of the exam\<close> *)
|
||||||
|
| checker (* \<open>the 'proof-reader' of the exam\<close> *)
|
||||||
|
| externalExaminer (* \<open>an external 'proof-reader' of the exam\<close> *)
|
||||||
|
| student (* \<open>the victim ;-) ... \<close> *)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Author =
|
||||||
|
affiliation :: "string"
|
||||||
|
email :: "string"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
datatype Subject =
|
||||||
|
algebra | geometry | statistical | analysis
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
datatype Level =
|
||||||
|
oneStar | twoStars | threeStars
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
datatype Grade =
|
||||||
|
A1 | A2 | A3
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Exam_item =
|
||||||
|
level :: "int option"
|
||||||
|
concerns :: "ContentClass set"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Header = Exam_item +
|
||||||
|
examSubject :: "(Subject) list"
|
||||||
|
date :: string
|
||||||
|
timeAllowed :: int (* minutes *)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
type_synonym SubQuestion = string
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Answer_Formal_Step = Exam_item +
|
||||||
|
justification :: string
|
||||||
|
"term" :: "string"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Answer_YesNo = Exam_item +
|
||||||
|
step_label :: string
|
||||||
|
yes_no :: bool (* \<open>for checkboxes\<close> *)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
datatype Question_Type =
|
||||||
|
formal | informal | mixed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Task = Exam_item +
|
||||||
|
local_grade :: Level
|
||||||
|
type :: Question_Type
|
||||||
|
subitems :: "(SubQuestion * (Answer_Formal_Step list + Answer_YesNo)list) list"
|
||||||
|
concerns :: "ContentClass set" <= "{setter,student,checker,externalExaminer}"
|
||||||
|
mark :: int
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Exercise = Exam_item +
|
||||||
|
content :: "(Task) list"
|
||||||
|
concerns :: "ContentClass set" <= "{setter,student,checker,externalExaminer}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
text\<open>In many institutions, it makes sense to have a rigorous process of validation
|
||||||
|
for exam subjects : is the initial question correct ? Is a proof in the sense of the
|
||||||
|
question possible ? We model the possibility that the @{term setter} validates a
|
||||||
|
question by a sample proof validated by Isabelle. In our scenario this sample proofs
|
||||||
|
are completely @{emph \<open>intern\<close>}, i.e. not exposed to the students but just additional
|
||||||
|
material for the internal review process of the exam.\<close>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Validation =
|
||||||
|
tests :: "term list" <="[]"
|
||||||
|
proofs :: "thm list" <="[]"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class Solution = Exam_item +
|
||||||
|
content :: "Exercise list"
|
||||||
|
valids :: "Validation list"
|
||||||
|
concerns :: "ContentClass set" <= "{setter,checker,externalExaminer}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
doc_class MathExam =
|
||||||
|
content :: "(Header + Author + Exercise) list"
|
||||||
|
global_grade :: Grade
|
||||||
|
accepts "\<lbrace>Author\<rbrace>\<^sup>+ ~~ Header ~~ \<lbrace>Exercise ~~ Solution\<rbrace>\<^sup>+ "
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(*
|
||||||
|
exercise - (header ~ context_description ~ task list)
|
||||||
|
*)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(*
|
||||||
|
tasks & subtask
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
answer > subanswer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
answer_element
|
||||||
|
- text
|
||||||
|
- checkbox
|
||||||
|
- radiobutton
|
||||||
|
- equational derivation
|
||||||
|
- proof derivation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
solution > subsolution
|
||||||
|
- test
|
||||||
|
- checkbox
|
||||||
|
- radiobutton
|
||||||
|
- equational derivation
|
||||||
|
- proof derivation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
marking > submarking
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
grade
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Invarianten:
|
||||||
|
1 : n Relation answer_element \<longrightarrow> subsolution
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2 : invariants over markings and grades
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(*>>*)
|
||||||
|
end
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue