Second steps to reform cicm paper

examples/scholarly_paper/2018-cicm-isabelle_dof-applications/IsaDofApplications.thy

@@ -21,8 +21,15 @@ declare[[strict_monitor_checking=false]]
 
 setup \<open>   DOF_lib.define_shortcut \<^binding>\<open>isadof\<close>    "\\isadof"
        #> DOF_lib.define_shortcut \<^binding>\<open>LaTeX\<close>     "\\LaTeX{}"
+       #> DOF_lib.define_shortcut \<^binding>\<open>Protege\<close>   "Prot{\\'e}g{\\'e}"
        #> DOF_lib.define_shortcut \<^binding>\<open>dots\<close>      "\\ldots"
-       #> DOF_lib.define_shortcut \<^binding>\<open>isabelle\<close>  "Isabelle/HOL"\<close> 
+       #> DOF_lib.define_shortcut \<^binding>\<open>isabelle\<close>  "Isabelle/HOL"
+
+\<close>
+
+(* slanted text in contrast to italics *)
+setup\<open>    DOF_lib.define_macro \<^binding>\<open>slanted_text\<close> "\\textsl{" "}" (K(K()))\<close> 
+
 
 (*>*)
 
@@ -61,6 +68,9 @@ abstract*[abs::abstract, keywordlist="[''Ontology'',''Ontological Modeling'',''I
     ontologies inside \<^isadof>, how to use the resulting meta-information 
    for enforcing a certain document structure, and discuss ontology-specific 
    IDE support. 
+
+   %% If you consider citing this paper, please refer to 
+   %% @{cite "brucker.ea:isabelle-ontologies:2018"}.
 \<close>
 
 section*[intro::introduction]\<open> Introduction \<close>  
@@ -121,21 +131,21 @@ scenarios from the point of view of the ontology modeling. In @{text_section (un
 we discuss the user-interaction generated from the ontological definitions.  Finally, we draw 
 conclusions and discuss related work in @{text_section (unchecked) \<open>conclusion\<close>}. \<close>  
 
-section*[bgrnd::text_section,main_author="Some(@{docitem ''adb''}::author)"]
+section*[bgrnd::text_section,main_author="Some(@{docitem ''bu''}::author)"]
         \<open> Background: The Isabelle System \<close>
 text*[background::introduction]\<open>
 While Isabelle is widely perceived as an interactive theorem prover
 for HOL (Higher-order Logic)~@{cite "nipkow.ea:isabelle:2002"}, we
 would like to emphasize the view that Isabelle is far more than that:
 it is the \<^emph>\<open>Eclipse of Formal Methods Tools\<close>.  This refers to the
-``\textsl{generic system framework of Isabelle/Isar underlying recent
+``\<^slanted_text>\<open>generic system framework of Isabelle/Isar underlying recent
   versions of Isabelle.  Among other things, Isar provides an
   infrastructure for Isabelle plug-ins, comprising extensible state
   components and extensible syntax that can be bound to ML
   programs. Thus, the Isabelle/Isar architecture may be understood as
   an extension and refinement of the traditional `LCF approach', with
   explicit infrastructure for building derivative
-  \<^emph>\<open>systems\<close>.}''~@{cite "wenzel.ea:building:2007"} 
+  \<^emph>\<open>systems\<close>.\<close>''~@{cite "wenzel.ea:building:2007"} 
 
 The current system framework offers moreover the following features:
 
@@ -152,10 +162,10 @@ figure*[architecture::figure,relative_width="100",src="''figures/isabelle-archit
      asynchronous communication between the Isabelle system and 
      the IDE (right-hand side). \<close>
 
-text*[blug::introduction]\<open> The Isabelle system architecture shown in @{docitem \<open>architecture\<close>}
+text*[blug::introduction]\<open> The Isabelle system architecture shown in @{figure \<open>architecture\<close>}
  comes with many layers, with Standard ML (SML) at the bottom layer as implementation 
 language. The architecture actually foresees a \<^emph>\<open>Nano-Kernel\<close> (our terminology) which 
-resides in the SML structure \texttt{Context}. This structure provides a kind of container called 
+resides in the SML structure \<^ML_structure>\<open>Context\<close>. This structure provides a kind of container called 
 \<^emph>\<open>context\<close> providing an identity, an ancestor-list as well as typed, user-defined state 
 for components (plugins) such as \<^isadof>. On top of the latter, the LCF-Kernel, tactics, 
 automated proof procedures as well as specific support for higher specification constructs
@@ -715,7 +725,7 @@ on documents mixing formal and informal content---a type of documents
 that is very common in technical certification processes. We see
 mainly one area of related works: IDEs and text editors that support
 editing and checking of documents based on an ontology.  There is a
-large group of ontology editors (\<^eg>, Prot{\'e}g{\'e}~@{cite "protege"},
+large group of ontology editors (\<^eg>, \<^Protege>~@{cite "protege"},
 Fluent Editor~@{cite "cognitum"}, NeOn~@{cite "neon"}, or
 OWLGrEd~@{cite "owlgred"}). With them, we share the support for defining
 ontologies as well as auto-completion when editing documents based on
@@ -725,7 +735,7 @@ OWLGrEd~@{cite "owlgred"}) also support graphical notations. This could
 be added to \<^isadof> in the future. A unique feature of \<^isadof> is the
 deep integration of formal and informal text parts. The only other
 work in this area we are aware of is rOntorium~@{cite "rontorium"}, a plugin
-for Prot{\'e}g{\'e} that integrates R~@{cite "adler:r:2010"} into an
+for \<^Protege> that integrates R~@{cite "adler:r:2010"} into an
 ontology environment. Here, the main motivation behind this
 integration is to allow for statistically analyze ontological
 documents. Thus, this is complementary to our work.

examples/scholarly_paper/2018-cicm-isabelle_dof-applications/document/preamble.tex

@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@
 
 
 \subject{Example of an Academic Paper\footnote{%
-  This document is an example setup for writing academic paper. While
+  This document is an example setup for writing an academic paper. While
-  it is optimized for Springer's LNCS class, it uses a Koma Script
+  it is optimized for the Springer's LNCS class, it uses a Koma Script
-  LaTeX class to avoid the need for distributing \texttt{llncs.cls},
+  LaTeX class to avoid the re-distribution of \texttt{llncs.cls},
   which would violate Springer's copyright. This example has been
   published at CICM 2018:
     \protect\begin{quote}

examples/scholarly_paper/2018-cicm-isabelle_dof-applications/document/root.bib

@@ -279,3 +279,21 @@
   year = {2018}
 }
 
+@incollection{brucker.ea:isabelle-ontologies:2018,
+  abstract = {While Isabelle is mostly known as part of Isabelle/HOL (an interactive theorem prover), it actually provides a framework for developing a wide spectrum of applications. A particular strength of the Isabelle framework is the combination of text editing, formal verification, and code generation.\\\\Up to now, Isabelle's document preparation system lacks a mechanism for ensuring the structure of different document types (as, e.g., required in certification processes) in general and, in particular, mechanism for linking informal and formal parts of a document.\\\\In this paper, we present Isabelle/DOF, a novel Document Ontology Framework on top of Isabelle. Isabelle/DOF allows for conventional typesetting \emph{as well} as formal development. We show how to model document ontologies inside Isabelle/DOF, how to use the resulting meta-information for enforcing a certain document structure, and discuss ontology-specific IDE support.},
+  address = {Heidelberg},
+  author = {Achim D. Brucker and Idir Ait-Sadoune and Paolo Crisafulli and Burkhart Wolff},
+  booktitle = {Conference on Intelligent Computer Mathematics (CICM)},
+  doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-96812-4_3},
+  keywords = {Isabelle/Isar, HOL, Ontologies},
+  language = {USenglish},
+  location = {Hagenberg, Austria},
+  number = {11006},
+  pdf = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/download/2018/brucker.ea-isabelle-ontologies-2018.pdf},
+  publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
+  series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
+  title = {Using The Isabelle Ontology Framework: Linking the Formal with the Informal},
+  url = {https://www.brucker.ch/bibliography/abstract/brucker.ea-isabelle-ontologies-2018},
+  year = {2018}
+}
+

examples/scholarly_paper/2020-iFM-CSP/document/root.bib

@@ -11308,5 +11308,22 @@ abstract="In this paper, we present various extensions of Isabelle/HOL by theori
 isbn="978-3-642-16690-7"
 }
 
-
+@incollection{HOL-CSP-iFM2020,
+  keywords = {Process-Algebra, Concurrency, Computational Models, Parametric System Verification},
+  author = {Safouan Taha and Lina Ye and Burkhart Wolff},
+  booktitle = {Integrated Formal Methods (iFM)},
+  language = {USenglish},
+  publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
+  address = {Heidelberg},
+  series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
+  number = {12546},
+  doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-63461-2_23},
+  editor = {Carlo A. Furia},
+  title = {{P}hilosophers may {D}ine - {D}efinitively!},
+  pdf = {https://www.lri.fr/~wolff/papers/conf/2020-iFM_CSP.pdf},
+  classification = {conference},
+  areas = {formal methods, software},
+  year = {2020},
+  public = {yes}
+}
 

examples/scholarly_paper/2020-iFM-CSP/paper.thy

@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ abstract*[abs, keywordlist="[\<open>Shallow Embedding\<close>,\<open>Process-Alg
 
    We demonstrate a number of resulting verification-techniques for classical, generalized examples:
    The CopyBuffer and Dijkstra's Dining Philosopher Problem of an arbitrary size.
+
+   If you consider citing this paper, please refer to @{cite "HOL-CSP-iFM2020"}.
 \<close>
 text\<open>\<^vs>\<open>-1.3cm\<close>\<close>
 section*[introheader::introduction,main_author="Some(@{docitem ''bu''}::author)"]\<open> Introduction \<close>